Implications of pathologist concordance for breast cancer assessments in mammography screening from age 40 years
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Human Pathology
- Vol. 33 (3) , 365-371
- https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.32222
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic Factors in Breast CancerArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2000
- Is centralized histopathology review necessary for screen-detected breast lesions?The Breast, 1999
- A trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of annual mammographic screening in women starting at age 40Journal of Medical Screening, 1999
- Routinely available indicators of prognosis in breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1998
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- Interobserver Reproducibility of the Nottingham Modification of the Bloom and Richardson Histologic Grading Scheme for Infiltrating Ductal CarcinomaAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995
- Consistency of histopathological reporting of breast lesions detected by screening: Findings of the U.K. National External Quality Assessment (EQA) schemeEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long‐term follow‐upHistopathology, 1991
- Comparative pathology of breast cancer in a randomised trial of screeningBritish Journal of Cancer, 1991
- COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY OF PREVALENT AND INCIDENT CANCERS DETECTED BY BREAST SCREENINGThe Lancet, 1986