Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Dento maxillo facial radiology
- Vol. 32 (4) , 229-234
- https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/26310390
Abstract
This study provides effective dose measurements for two extraoral direct digital imaging devices, the NewTom 9000 cone beam CT (CBCT) unit and the Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Thermoluminescent dosemeters were placed at 20 sites throughout the layers of the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent RANDO phantom. Variations in phantom orientation and beam collimation were used to create three different CBCT examination techniques: a combined maxillary and mandibular scan (Max/Man), a maxillary scan and a mandibular scan. Ten exposures for each technique were used to ensure a reliable measure of radiation from the dosemeters. Average tissue-absorbed dose, weighted equivalent dose and effective dose were calculated for each major anatomical site. Effective doses of individual organs were summed with salivary gland exposures (E(SAL)) and without salivary gland exposures (E(ICRP60)) to calculate two measures of whole-body effective dose. The effective doses for CBCT were: Max/Man scan, E(ICRP60)=36.3 micro Sv, E(SAL)=77.9 micro Sv; maxillary scan, E(ICRP60)=19.9 micro Sv, E(SAL)=41.5 micro Sv; and mandibular scan, E(ICRP60)=34.7 micro Sv, E(SAL)=74.7 micro Sv. Effective doses for the panoramic examination were E(ICRP60)=6.2 micro Sv and E(SAL)=22.0 micro Sv. When viewed in the context of potential diagnostic yield, the E(ICRP60) of 36.3 micro Sv for the NewTom compares favourably with published effective doses for conventional CT (314 micro Sv) and film tomography (2-9 micro Sv per image). CBCT examinations resulted in doses that were 3-7 (E(ICRP60)) and 2-4 (E(SAL)) times the panoramic doses observed in this study.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomographyDento maxillo facial radiology, 2001
- Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologyOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2000
- Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machineOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2000
- Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomographyOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 1997
- Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics.Dento maxillo facial radiology, 1994
- 1992 assessment of radiation risk from dental radiography.Dento maxillo facial radiology, 1992
- IntroductionAnnals of the ICRP, 1991
- Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiologyOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1988
- Absorbed bone marrow dose in certain dental radiographic techniquesThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1979
- Geometric method for measuring body surface area: A height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adultsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1978