Clinical Evaluation of the Humphrey Automatic Refractor
- 1 June 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 102 (6) , 870-875
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030690020
Abstract
• A new automatic objective refractor was used on healthy adults. In the absence of cycloplegic drugs, spherocylindrical objective refractions performed with the instrument provided 20/20 acuity 96% as often as with standard subjective techniques. No instrument-induced accommodations effects were seen. One hundred percent of instrument spherical findings were repeatable within 0.50 diopters; all cylindrical findings were repeatable within 0.37 D. This result represents a higher level of repeatability than that reported for standard subjective refraction under clinical conditions. In the absence of cycloplegic drugs, the correlation coefficient between the instrument's findings and standard subjective spherical findings was.97 v.98 between two practitioners' subjective refractions. The average difference between cylindrical findings of the instrument and those of an experienced practitioner was 0.04 D larger than the average difference seen between two practitioners using subjective techniques.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automated refractionActa Ophthalmologica, 1991
- A Comparison of Clinical Refractive Data Obtained by Three ExaminersOptometry and Vision Science, 1982
- Is the Autorefractor Reading Closest to Manifest Refraction?Archives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1978
- Clinical Evaluation of the 6600 AutorefractorArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1978
- An Automatic Objective OptometerArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1975
- The OphthalmetronArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1974
- PRELIMINARY CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE DIOPTRONOptometry and Vision Science, 1974
- Astigmatic difference in refractive errors.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1968