Legal principles in the psychiatric assessment of personal injury litigants
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in American Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 146 (3) , 304-310
- https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.146.3.304
Abstract
The authors review the legal principles that a psychiatrist must understand in assessing the emotional and psychiatric sequelae of a personal injury leading to a litigation claim. The principles of the establishment of fault or liability, the assessment of pain and suffering, causal connection, the credibility of the plaintiff, the credibility of the expert witness, the determination of prognosis, the award of damages, and the adversarial system are discussed. An appreciation of these principles will enable psychiatrists to provide assessments that will be useful to the legal system in arriving at a fair and accurate determination of the compensation to which a victim is entitled.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent Opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial AffairsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1986
- How to write a psychiatric report for litigation following a personal injuryAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1986
- Expert witnesses examined on dealing with ethical dilemmasPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1984
- Differences in repeated psychiatric examinations of litigants to a lawsuitAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1983
- Soft-Tissue Injuries of the Neck in Automobile AccidentsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1974
- PSYCHIATRIC SEQUELAE OF MINOR HEAD INJURYBrain, 1972
- Workmen's Compensation for Psychiatric DisordersPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1965