Outcome in Psychotherapy Evaluated by Independent Judges
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 131 (4) , 410-414
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.131.4.410
Abstract
To overcome common limitations in assessing the outcome of psychotherapy, the following method was used: independent assessment by teams of experienced psychotherapists; individualized measures of outcome; and videotaped clinical interviews to allow the judges to rate, at one sitting, a patient's clinical state before and after eight months of therapy. Agreement between the judges' ratings was low both for the severity of the clinical state and for its outcome. Possible reasons for this low agreement are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventoryBehavioral Science, 1974
- The Outcome Problem in Psychotherapy ResearchArchives of General Psychiatry, 1973
- Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programsCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1968
- Clinician's response style: A source of variation and bias in clinical judgments.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1968
- A Study of Psychodynamic Changes in Untreated Neurotic PatientsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1968
- Target Complaints as Criteria of ImprovementAmerican Journal of Psychotherapy, 1966