Determinants of the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm.
Open Access
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of cell biology
- Vol. 120 (1) , 175-184
- https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.120.1.175
Abstract
The purposes of this study were: (a) to measure the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm; (b) to define quantitatively the factors that determine solute translation; and (c) to compare and contrast solute rotation and translation. A small fluorescent probe, 2,7-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and 6-)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF), was introduced into the cytoplasm of Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. BCECF translation was measured by fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching; rotation was measured by Fourier transform polarization microscopy. Diffusion coefficients relative to those in water (D/D0) were determined by comparing mobility in cytoplasm with mobility in standard solutions of known viscosity. At isosmotic cell volume, the relative diffusion coefficients for BCECF translation and rotation in cytoplasm were 0.27 +/- 0.01 (SEM, n = 24, 23 degrees C) and 0.78 +/- 0.03 (n = 4), respectively. As cell volume increased from 0.33 to 2 times isosmotic volume, the relative translational diffusion coefficient increased from 0.047 to 0.32, while the relative rotational diffusion coefficient remained constant. The factors determining BCECF translation were evaluated by comparing rotation and translation in cytoplasm, and in artificial solutions containing dextrans (mobile barriers) and agarose gels (immobile barriers). It was concluded that the hindrance of BCECF translation in cytoplasm could be quantitatively attributed to three independent factors: (a) fluid-phase cytoplasmic viscosity is 28% greater than the viscosity of water (factor 1 = 0.78); (b) 19% of BCECF is transiently bound to intracellular components of low mobility (factor 2 = 0.81); and most importantly, (c) translation of unbound BCECF is hindered 2.5-fold by collisions with cell solids comprising 13% of isosmotic cell volume (factor 3 = 0.40). The product of the 3 factors is 0.25 +/- 0.03, in good agreement with the measured D/D0 of 0.27 +/- 0.01. These results provide the first measurement of the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm and define quantitatively the factors that slow solute translation.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fluorescence depolarization of cis- and trans-parinaric acids in artificial and red cell membranes resolved by a double hindered rotational modelBiochemistry, 1989
- Subcellular compartmentalization by local differentiation of cytoplasmic structureCell Motility, 1988
- Lateral Diffusion of Proteins in MembranesAnnual Review of Physiology, 1987
- The cytomatrix: a short history of its study.The Journal of cell biology, 1984
- Intracellular water and the cytomatrix: some methods of study and current views.The Journal of cell biology, 1984
- Diffusion in the aqueous compartment.The Journal of cell biology, 1984
- Mobility of microinjected rhodamine actin within living chicken gizzard cells determined by fluorescence photobleaching recoveryCell, 1982
- No need for a new membrane modelNature, 1981
- Association dynamics and lateral transport in biological membranesJournal of Supramolecular Structure and Cellular Biochemistry, 1981
- Analysis of cell surface interactions by measurements of lateral mobilityJournal of Supramolecular Structure, 1979