Neuroimaging: do we really need new contrast agents for MRI?
- 30 June 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 34 (3) , 166-178
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00197-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimization of Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using an Automated Bolus-Detection Algorithm (MR SmartPrep)yInvestigative Radiology, 1998
- Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Cerebral ArteriesInvestigative Radiology, 1998
- Effects of contrast dose, delayed imaging, and magnetization transfer saturation on gadolinium‐enhanced MR imaging of brain lesionsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997
- High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary resultsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996
- Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiographyMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996
- Safety and Efficacy of Dotarem (Gd-DOTA) versus Magnevist (Gd-DTPA) in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Central Nervous SystemInvestigative Radiology, 1995
- Synergistic Enhancement of MRI with Gd-DTPA and Magnetization TransferJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1992
- Functional cerebral imaging by susceptibility‐contrast NMRMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1990
- Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agentsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1990
- Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: Contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effectsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1988