Multisite Comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-Lymphocyte Counting by Single- versus Multiple-Platform Methodologies: Evaluation of Beckman Coulter Flow-Count Fluorospheres and the tetraONE System
Open Access
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
- Vol. 7 (3) , 344-351
- https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.7.3.344-351.2000
Abstract
New analytic methods that permit absolute CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations to be performed entirely on the flow cytometer have the potential for improving assay precision and accuracy. In a multisite trial, we compared two different single-platform assay methods with a predicate two-color assay in which the absolute lymphocyte count was derived by conventional hematology. A two-color method employing lymphocyte light scatter gating and Beckman Coulter Flow-Count fluorospheres for absolute counting produced within-laboratory precision equivalent to that of the two-color predicate method, as measured by coefficient of variation of replicate measurements. The fully automated Beckman Coulter tetraONE System four-color assay employing CD45 lymphocyte gating, automated analysis, and absolute counting by fluorospheres resulted in a small but significant improvement in the within-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 cell counts and percentages suggesting that the CD45 lymphocyte gating and automated analysis might have contributed to the improved performance. Both the two-color method employing Flow-Count fluorospheres and the four-color tetraONE System provided significant and substantial improvements in between-laboratory precision of absolute counts. In some laboratories, absolute counts obtained by the single-platform methods showed small but consistent differences relative to the predicate method. Comparison of each laboratory's absolute counts with the five-laboratory median value suggested that these differences resulted from a bias in the absolute lymphocyte count obtained from the hematology instrument in some laboratories. These results demonstrate the potential for single-platform assay methods to improve within-laboratory and between-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations compared with conventional assay methods.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of TruCount Absolute-Count Tubes for Determining CD4 and CD8 Cell Numbers in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive AdultsClinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2000
- Standardization of absolute CD4+ lymphocyte counts across laboratories: An evaluation of the ortho CytoronAbsolute flow cytometry system on normal donorsCytometry, 1995
- Guideline for flow cytometric immunophenotyping: A report from the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases, division of AIDSCytometry, 1993
- Characterization of T Lymphocyte Subset Alterations by Flow Cytometry in HIV DiseaseAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Consistency of routine measurements of CD4+, CD8+ peripheral blood lymphocytesJournal of Immunological Methods, 1992
- Effect of type of haematology analyser on CD4 countThe Lancet, 1992
- CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Enumeration for Prediction of Clinical Course of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease: A ReviewThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Quality control in the flow cytometric measurement of T-lymphocyte subsets: The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study experienceClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1990
- HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in seropositive individualsNature, 1987
- Quantitation of cell concentration using the flow cytometerCytometry, 1982