Will a New Clinical Decision Rule Be Widely Used? the Case of the Canadian C‐Spine Rule
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 13 (4) , 413-420
- https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.11.080
Abstract
The reasons why some clinical decision rules (CDRs) become widely used and others do not are not well understood. The authors wanted to know the following: 1) To what extent is widespread use of a new, relatively complex CDR an attainable goal? 2) How do physician perceptions of the new CDR compare with those of a widely used rule? 3) To what extent do physician subgroups differ in likelihood to use a new rule? A survey of 399 Canadian emergency physicians was conducted using Dillman's Tailored Design Method for postal surveys. The physicians were queried regarding the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule (C-Spine Rule). Results were analyzed via frequency distributions, tests of association, and logistic regression. Response rate was 69.2% (262/376). Most respondents (83.6%) reported having already seen the Canadian C-Spine Rule, while 63.0% reported already using it. Of those who did not currently use the rule, 74.2% reported that they would consider using it in the future despite the fact that, compared with another widely used rule (the Ottawa Ankle Rules), the C-Spine Rule was rated as less easy to learn (z = 6.68, p < 0.001), remember (z = 7.37, p < 0.001), and use (z = 5.90, p < 0.001). Those who had never seen the rule before were older (chi2(2) = 5.10, p = 0.007) and more likely to work part-time (chi2(2) = 7.31, p = 0.026). The best predictors of whether the rule would be used was whether it had first been seen during training (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14 to 6.04), was perceived as an efficient use of time (OR, 4.44; 95% CI = 1.12 to 16.89), and was too much trouble to apply (OR, 0.25; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.77). Widespread use of a relatively complex rule is possible. Older and part-time physicians were less likely to have seen the Canadian C-Spine Rule but not less likely to use it once they had seen it. Targeting hard-to-reach subpopulations while stressing the safety and convenience of these rules is most likely to increase use of new CDRs.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Decision Rules "in the Real World": How a Widely Disseminated Rule Is Used in Everyday PracticeAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Methods of Cognitive Analysis to Support the Design and Evaluation of Biomedical Systems: The Case of Clinical Practice GuidelinesJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2001
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Toward a Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Model of Health Care Research UseScience Communication, 1998
- Derivation of a Decision Rule for the Use of Radiography in Acute Knee InjuriesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuriesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Use of Clinical Judgment Analysis to Explain Regional Variations in Physicians' Accuracies in Diagnosing PneumoniaMedical Decision Making, 1991
- Clinical Prediction RulesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The Rate of Adoption of New Procedures Among Physicians The Impact of Specialty and Practice CharacteristicsMedical Care, 1985
- A Protocol for Selecting Patients with Injured Extremities Who Need X-RaysNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982