Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital using drug vs. drug discrimination training
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 53 (2) , 195-199
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00426492
Abstract
Rats learned drug vs. drug (D vs. D) or drug vs. no drug (D vs. N) discriminations in a T-maze shock-escape task with various doses of pentobarbital, phenobarbital, or ethanol. Dose-effect curves were obtained for each drug using D vs. N training. After D vs. N training with any one of these drugs, rats made D choices during substitution tests with the other two drugs, suggesting drug interchangeability. D vs. D training also showed that pentobarbital and phenobarbital were virtually indistinguishable from one another. However, ethanol was readily discriminated from pentobarbital, showing that the two drugs differed. The results show the utility of D vs. D training as a method for studying drug differences that may be too small to detect with substitution tests.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- ?9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, ethanol, and amphetamine as discriminative stimuli-generalization tests with other drugsPsychopharmacology, 1976
- A comparison of the discriminable CNS effects of ketamine, phencyclidine and pentobarbital.1975
- Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats.1974
- Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.1974
- Mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) as discriminative stimuliPsychopharmacology, 1971
- State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugsPsychopharmacology, 1966