Speech Perception by Four Single-Channel Cochlear Implant Users
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 30 (4) , 480-493
- https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3004.480
Abstract
Four profoundly deaf adults, each a recent recipient of a scala tympani implant, underwent auditory and auditory-visual speech comprehension evaluations. Two subjects had multiple-electrode auditory prostheses, and 2 had single-electrode implants. All subjects were tested preoperatively with a high-power hearing aid, and postoperatively with a single-channel wearable sound processor. Reported here are the results of the first formal speech recognition tests which were conducted during the 8 months after the sound processor fitting. Three subjects had used the single-channel processor on a daily basis for up to 8 months at the time of postoperative testing. The 4th subject was a nonuser. On listening tests, a comparison between pre- and post-implant scores revealed little difference for any subject. On postoperative speechreading tasks, all subjects identified medial consonant phonemes and 2-digit numerals better with stimulation than without. The 3 frequent users of the device experienced significant improvement on connected-discourse tracking, and their speechreading of videotaped and live voice CID Everyday Sentences (Davis & Silverman, 1978) was enhanced with the addition of stimulation. The nonuser was a very proficient speechreader at the outset and exhibited no significant difference on connected-discourse tracking with and without stimulation. Moreover her ability to speechread Everyday Sentences was hampered slightly by the addition of stimulation. This single-channel sound processor functioned as a sensory supplement for the 3 frequent users, but no subject was able to use the processor as a sensory substitute.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Previous Experience as a Confounding Factor in Comparing Cochlear-Implant Processing SchemesJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1986
- Speech-Tracking Performance in Single-Channel Cochlear Implant SubjectsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1985
- Initial Iowa Results with the Multichannel Cochlear Implant from MelbourneJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1984
- A 12-Consonant Confusion Study on a Multiple-Channel Cochlear Implant PatientJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1982
- Interim Assessment of Candidates for Cochlear ImplantsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1982
- Voice pitch as an aid to lipreadingNature, 1981
- Speech Perception With Hearing Aids and Cochlear ImplantsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1981
- A Multiple-Channel Cochlear Implant: Evaluation Using Speech TrackingJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1981
- Investigating the MESA (Multipoint Electrotactile Speech Aid): The transmission of connected discourseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979
- Investigating the MESA (Multipoint Electrotactile Speech Aid): The transmission of segmental features of speechThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978