Twin Crossover Relative Potency Analgesic Assays in Man. I. Morphine Vs. Morphine
- 9 August 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 17 (8-9) , 461-479
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1977.tb05639.x
Abstract
Although the 4-point relative potency assay using crossover design proved to be a powerful technique for the clinical evaluation of analgesics in patients with chronic pain, excessive dropouts have made this design impractical in postoperative pain. The "twin crossover" design, however, coupled with a sequential decision-making process that expedites choosing the doses of the test medication which are most closely equianalgesic with the standard, yielded excellent analgesic assay sensitivity and made efficient use of the population of postoperative patients studied. Each subject receives only 2 of the 4 possible treatments.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Twin Crossover Relative Potency Analgesic Assays in Man. II. Morphine Vs. 8‐MethoxycyclazocineThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1977
- Abstracts of papers†Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1976
- A comparison of the analgesic effects of profadol and morphine in patients with cancerClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1969
- A clinical comparison of the effects of oral and intramuscular administration of analgesics: Pentazocine and phenazocineClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1968
- A dinical eomparison of the analgesie effects of methadone and morphine administered intramuseularly, and oforally and parenterally administered methadoneClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1967
- A comparison of the analgesic effects of pentazocine and morphine in patients with cancerClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1966
- A comparison of the analgesic effects of methotrimeprazine and morphine in patients with cancerClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1966
- On Cross‐over Tests with a Graded Response: Statistical Analyses and the Concept of the “Log‐dose Difference Response‐Difference Line”.Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, 1961
- Clinical pharmacology of analgesics: 1. A method of assaying analgesic effectClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1960
- How to Use Ridit AnalysisPublished by JSTOR ,1958