Logical Syntax and Semantics

Abstract
Formal semantics and pragmatics as they have developed since the late 1960's have been shaped by fruitful interdisciplinary collaboration among linguists, philosophers, and logicians, among others, and in turn have had noticeable effects on developments in syntax, philosophy of language, computational linguistics, and cognitive science. In this paper I describe the environment in which formal semantics was born and took root, highlighting the differences in ways of thinking about natural language semantics in linguistics and in philosophy and logic. With Montague as a central but not solo player in the story, I reflect on crucial developments in the 1960's and 70's in linguistics and philosophy, and the growth of formal semantics and formal pragmatics from there. I discuss innovations, key players, and leading ideas that shaped the development of formal semantics and its relation to syntax, to pragmatics, and to the philosophy of language in its early years, and some central aspects of its early impact on those fields.ReferencesAbbott, B. 1999. ‘The formal approach to meaning: Formal semantics and its recent developments’. Journal of Foreign Languages (Shanghai)119, no. 1: 2–20. https://www.msu.edu/~abbottb/formal.htm. Ajdukiewicz, K. 1960. Je¸zyk i Poznanie (Language and Knowledge). Warsaw. Bach, E. 1968. ‘Nouns and Noun Phrases’. In E. Bach & R.T. Harms (eds.) ‘Universals in Linguistic Theory’, 90–122. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Bach, E. 1989. Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. New York: State University of New York Press. Bar-Hillel, Y. 1954a. ‘Logical syntax and semantics’. Language 30: 230–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/410265 Bar-Hillel, Y. 1954b. ‘Indexical Expressions’. Mind 63: 359–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXIII.251.359 Bar-Hillel, Y. 1963. ‘Remarks on Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language’. In P. A. Schilpp (ed.) ‘The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap’, 519–543. LaSalle, Illinois / London: Open Court / Cambridge University Press. Barker, C. & Jacobson, P. (eds.). 2007. Direct Compositionality. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bernstein, L. 1976. The unanswered question: six talks at Harvard: The Charles Eliot Norton Lectures 1973. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Bohnert, H. & Backer, P. 1967. ‘Automatic English-to-Logic Translation in a Simplified Model: A Study in the Logic of Grammar’. IBM Research Paper RC-1744. Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM. Burris, S. 2009. ‘The Algebra of Logic tradition’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/algebra-logic-tradition/. Carnap, R. 1928. Der logische aufbau der welt. Berlin-Schlachtensee: Weltkreisverlag. Carnap, R. 1946. ‘Modalities and quantification’. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 11.2: 33–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2268610 Carnap, R. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press. Carnap, R. 1956. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. 2nd edition with supplements. Chicago: Phoenix Books, University of Chicago Press. Carnap, R. & Smeaton, A. 1937. The logical syntax of language: International library of psychology, philosophy and scientific method. London: Routledge & K. Paul Ltd. Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. 1990. Meaning and Grammar. An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. 1955. ‘Logical syntax and semantics: their linguistic relevance’. Language 31: 36–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/410891 Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. 1971. ‘Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation’. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (eds.) ‘Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology’, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chomsky, N. 1975. ‘Questions of form and interpretation’. In R. Austerlitz (ed.) ‘The Scope of American Linguistics’, 159–196. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press. Church, A. 1940. ‘A formulation of the simple theory of types’. Journal of Symbolic Logic 5: 56–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2266170 Church, A. 1951. ‘A formulation of the logic of sense and denotation’. In P. Henle, H. Kallen & S. Langer (eds.) ‘Structure, Method, and Meaning: Essays in Honor of H.M. Sheffer’, 3–24. New York: Liberal Arts Press. Cocchiarella, N. 1997. ‘Formally-oriented work in the philosophy of language’. In J.V. Canfield (ed.) ‘Philosophy of Meaning, Knowledge and Value in the 20th Century’, 39–75. London; New York: Routledge. Cresswell, M. J. 1978. ‘Semantic competence’. In F. Guenthner & M. Guenthner-Reutter (eds.) ‘Meaning and Translation: Philosophical and Linguistic Approaches’, 9–43. London: Duckworth. Davidson, D. 1964. ‘Theories of meaning and learnable languages’. In ‘Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science’, Jerusalem: North-Holland. Davidson, D. 1967. ‘The logical form of action sentences’. In N. Rescher (ed.) ‘The Logic of Decision and Action’, 81–95. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. Davidson, D. 1970. ‘Semantics for natural languages’. In B. Visentini (ed.) ‘Linguaggi nella Societa e nella Tecnica’, Milan: Edizioni di Comunita. Dowty, D. 1978a. A Guide to Montague’s PTQ. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Dowty, D. 1978b. ‘Governed transformations as...

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: