Relative Effects of Barrier Precautions and Topical Antibiotics on Nosocomial Bacterial Transmission: Results of Multi-compartment Models
Open Access
- 24 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
- Vol. 69 (7) , 2227-2248
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-007-9205-1
Abstract
Nosocomial bacterial infections in critically ill patients are generally preceded by asymptomatic carriage (i.e. colonization) at one, or even several, body sites such as the skin, the gastro-intestinal and the respiratory tract. Different routes of transmission between the colonized sites create a complex epidemiology, which is additionally complicated by the smallness of the patient population size and the rapid patient turnover, characteristic for intensive care units (ICUs). Naturally occurring large fluctuations in the prevalence of colonization make it very difficult to determine the efficacy of control measures that aim to reduce the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in ICUs. Theoretical models can sharpen our intuition through carefully designed thought experiments. In this spirit, we introduce and investigate two models that incorporate the fact that patients may be colonized at multiple body sites. Our study can be applied to several pathogens commonly found in ICUs, such Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, enteric Gram-negative bacteria, MRSA and enterococci. We evaluate the effects of barrier precautions (improved hygiene, use of gloves and gowns, etc.) and of administration of nonabsorbable antibiotics on the prevalence of colonization in ICUs and find that the effect of the controversial, though widely used, antibiotic prophylaxis can only be substantial if the patient-to-patient transmission has already been reduced to a subcritical level by barrier precautions. Taking into account that the very use of antibiotics may increase the selection for resistant strains and may thereby only add to the ever increasing problem of antibiotic resistance, our findings hence represent a firm theoretical argument against the routine use of topical antimicrobial prophylaxis for infection control.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survival Benefit in Critically Ill Burned Patients Receiving Selective Decontamination of the Digestive TractAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- Effects of selective decontamination of digestive tract on mortality and acquisition of resistant bacteria in intensive care: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2003
- Influence of Combined Intravenous and Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis on the Incidence of Infections, Organ Dysfunctions, and Mortality in Critically Ill Surgical PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Understanding the Spread of Antibiotic Resistant Pathogens in Hospitals: Mathematical Models as Tools for ControlClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia by Oral DecontaminationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Changing bacterial ecology during a five year period of selective intestinal decontaminationJournal of Hospital Infection, 1998
- The Role of "Colonization Pressure" in the Spread of Vancomycin-Resistant EnterococciArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1998
- Selective Intestinal Decontamination in Multiple Trauma PatientsThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1997
- Risk factors for pneumonia, and colonization of respiratory tract and stomach in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1996
- Intestinal Decontamination for Control of Nosocomial Multiresistant Gram-Negative BacilliAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989