Scale and the Nature of Spatial Variability: Field Examples Having Implications for Hydrologic Modeling
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 31 (1) , 173-184
- https://doi.org/10.1029/94wr02025
Abstract
In this paper we examine how the nature of spatial variability affects hydrologic response over a range of scales using five field studies as examples. The nature of variability was characterized as either stochastic, when random, or deterministic, when due to known, nonrandom sources. We have emphasized how that characterization may change with the scale of hydrologic model. The five field examples, along with corresponding sources of variability, were (1) infiltration and surface runoff affected by shrub canopy, (2) groundwater recharge affected by soil depth, (3) groundwater recharge and streamflow affected by small‐scale topography, (4) frozen soil runoff affected by elevation, and (5) snowfall distribution affected by large‐scale topography. In each example there was a scale, the deterministic length scale, over which the hydrologic response was strongly dependent upon the specific, location‐dependent ecosystem properties. Smaller‐scale variability may be represented as either stochastic or homogeneous with nonspatial data. In addition, changes in scale or location sometimes resulted in the introduction of larger‐scale sources of variability that subsume smaller‐scale sources. Thus recognition of the nature and sources of variability can reduce data requirements by focusing on important sources of variability and using nonspatial data to characterize variability at scales smaller than the deterministic length scale. All the sources of variability described are present in the same watershed and affect hydrologic response simultaneously. Physically based models should therefore utilize both spatial and stochastic data where scale appropriate. Other implications for physically based modeling are that modeling algorithms should reflect larger‐scale variability which generally has greater impact and that model and measurement grids should be consistent with the nature of variability.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based modelsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modelingPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Distribution of recharge and discharge areas in a first-order catchment as interpreted from water level patternsJournal of Hydrology, 1993
- Stochastic modelling of solute flux in the unsaturated zone at the field scaleJournal of Hydrology, 1993
- Groundwater response to snowmelt in a mountainous watershedJournal of Hydrology, 1992
- Hydrology of a forested hillslope during storm eventsGeoderma, 1990
- Groundwater recharge characteristics in a semi-arid environment of southwest IdahoJournal of Hydrology, 1981
- Mathematical simulation of subsurface flow contributions to snowmelt runoff, Reynolds Creek Watershed, IdahoWater Resources Research, 1974
- Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response modelJournal of Hydrology, 1969
- Source Areas of Storm RunoffWater Resources Research, 1969