Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examination
Open Access
- 11 March 2002
- Vol. 94 (5) , 1522-1531
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10364
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To retrospectively evaluate the significance of morphologic examination and ancillary studies performed on bilateral bone marrow biopsy specimens, 1864 bone marrow samples were studied.METHODS: Bilateral bone marrow biopsy specimens included 883 specimens that were evaluated for involvement by non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); 381 specimens that were evaluated for involvement by carcinoma (CA); 362 specimens that were evaluated for involvement by Hodgkin disease (HD); 94 specimens that were evaluated for involvement by sarcoma (SA); 56 specimens that were evaluated for involvement by multiple myeloma (MM); 53 specimens that were evaluated for involvement by acute and chronic leukemia, myelodysplasia, and/or myeloproliferative disorders (LEUK); and 35 specimens that were evaluated for other reasons.RESULTS: Of all 1864 specimens, 410 samples (22.0%) were positive for disease, including 77% of MM samples, 58% of LEUK samples, 29.6% of NHL samples, 14% of SA samples, 9.9% of HD samples, and 6.8% of CA samples. A discrepancy between the left and right sides was identified in 48 specimens (11.7% of positive samples). The discrepancy rate was 39% for HD samples, 29% for SA samples, 23% for CA samples, and 9.2% for NHL samples. No morphologic discrepancies between bilateral samples were found in MM samples or LEUK samples. Bilateral flow cytometric studies (n = 113 samples) were positive in 11 samples (9.7%; all morphologically positive), with two discrepancies detected between bilateral samples. Bilateral cytogenetic studies (n = 74 samples) were positive in 5 samples (7%), and there were no discrepancies. Bilateral molecular studies (n = 16 samples) were positive in 7 samples (44%), and there were 3 discrepancies.CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral morphologic evaluation is useful in the evaluation of patients with NHL, HD, CA, and SA and is not indicated for patients with acute or chronic leukemia, myelodysplasia, MM, and other diseases. Bilateral flow cytometric or cytogenetic studies of bone marrow did not provide additional information in this population to justify bilateral samples. The role of bilateral molecular analysis needs to be defined further, but pooled samples for molecular studies may be adequate. Cancer 2002;94:1522–31. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10364Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Burkitt-like lymphomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study delineating phenotypic, genotypic, and clinical featuresBlood, 2001
- Molecular Diagnostic Approach to Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaThe Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2000
- Correlation of PCR-Detected Clonal Gene Rearrangements with Bone Marrow Morphology in Patients with B-Lineage LymphomasThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1997
- Use of molecular diagnostic methods for lymphoma staging in bilateral bone marrow biopsies*Molecular Diagnosis, 1997
- Developments in cytogenetics and oncogenes in acute leukemiaCurrent Opinion in Oncology, 1997
- Value of bilateral bone marrow biopsy specimens in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1990
- Bone marrow involvement in young patients with non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma: The importance of multiple bone marrow samples for accurate stagingMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1989
- The value of bone marrow trephine biopsy in the diagnosis of metastatic neuroblastomaJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 1985
- Methods and prognostic value of bone marrow examination in small cell carcinoma of the lungCancer, 1984
- Bilateral trephine bone marrow biopsies in hodgkin's and non-hodgkin's lymphomaPathology, 1979