Nucleic acid sequences of the oncogene v-rel in reticuloendotheliosis virus strain T and its cellular homolog, the proto-oncogene c-rel
- 1 October 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Virology
- Vol. 52 (1) , 172-182
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.52.1.172-182.1984
Abstract
Reticuloendotheliosis virus strain T (Rev-T) is a highly oncogenic replication-defective retrovirus which contains the oncogene v-rel. It is thought that Rev-T arose when a virus similar to Rev-A, the helper virus of Rev-T, infected a turkey and recombined with c-rel from that turkey. There is one large c-rel locus in the turkey genome which contains all of the sequences homologous to v-rel (K. C. Wilhelmsen and H. M. Temin, J. Virol. 49:521-529, 1984). We have sequenced v-rel and its flanking sequences, each of the regions of the c-rel locus from turkey that are homologous to v-rel and their flanking sequences, and the coding sequence for env and part of pol of Rev-A. The v-rel coding sequences can be translated into a 503-amino acid env-v-rel-out-of-frame-env fusion polypeptide. We have not detected any sequences in the Los Alamos or University of California-San Diego data bases that are more significantly related to the amino acid or nucleic acid sequence of v-rel than to the randomized sequence of v-rel. Comparison of Rev-A, Rev-T, and c-rel indicates that the v-rel sequences may have been transduced from the c-rel (turkey) locus by a novel mechanism. There are sequences in Rev-A and c-rel that are similar to splicing signals, indicating that the 5' virus-rel junction of Rev-T may have been formed by cellular RNA splicing machinery. Eight presumed introns have presumably been spliced out of c-rel to generate v-rel. There are also short imperfect regions of homology between sequences at the boundaries of v-rel and sequences in Rev-A and c-rel (turkey), indicating that c-rel may have been transduced by homologous recombination. There are many differences between the amino acid sequences of the predicted translational products of v-rel and c-rel which may account for their difference in transformation potential. These sequence differences between v-rel and c-rel include 10 missense transitions, four missense transversions, and three places where Rev-T has a small in-frame deletion of sequences relative to c-rel. Most of the coding sequence differences between c-rel and v-rel are nonconservative amino acid changes.This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- c-fos protein can induce cellular transformation: A novel mechanism of activation of a cellular oncogeneCell, 1984
- Analysis of FBJ-MuSV provirus and c-fos (mouse) gene reveals that viral and cellular fos gene products have different carboxy terminiCell, 1983
- Structure and sequence of the cellular gene homologous to the RSV src gene and the mechanism for generating the transforming virusCell, 1983
- Mechanism of activation of a human oncogeneNature, 1982
- Substitution of 5′ helper virus sequences into non-rel portion of reticuloendotheliosis virus strain T suppresses transformation of chicken spleen cellsCell, 1982
- Loss of intervening sequences in genomic mouse α-globin DNA inserted in an infectious retrovirus vectorNature, 1982
- Nucleotide sequence of the genome of a murine sarcoma virusCell, 1981
- Complete Nucleotide Sequence and Organization of the Moloney Murine Sarcoma Virus GenomeScience, 1981
- Nucleotide sequence of Moloney murine leukaemia virusNature, 1981
- Sequence of retrovirus provirus resembles that of bacterial transposable elementsNature, 1980