A Comparison of Alternatives to Conducting Monte Carlo Analyses for Determining Parallel Analysis Criteria
- 1 July 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Vol. 24 (3) , 365-395
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6
Abstract
The parallel analysis method for determining the number of components to retain in a principal components analysis has received a recent resurgence of support and interest. However, researchers and practitioners desiring to use this criterion have been hampered by the required Monte Carlo analyses needed to develop the criteria. Two recent attempts at presenting regression estimation methods to determine eigenvalues were found to be deficient in several respects, and less accurate in general, than a simple linear interpolation of tabled random data eigenvalues generated through Monte Carlo simulation. Other methods for determining the parallel analysis criteria are discussed.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components.Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF ROOTS OF CERTAIN DETERMINANTAL EQUATIONSAnnals of Eugenics, 1939