Sampling-Based Approaches to Improve Estimation of Mortality among Patient Dropouts: Experience from a Large PEPFAR-Funded Program in Western Kenya
Open Access
- 2 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 3 (12) , e3843
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003843
Abstract
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of HIV care and treatment programs is impacted by losses to follow-up (LTFU) in the patient population. The severity of this effect is undeniable but its extent unknown. Tracing all lost patients addresses this but census methods are not feasible in programs involving rapid scale-up of HIV treatment in the developing world. Sampling-based approaches and statistical adjustment are the only scaleable methods permitting accurate estimation of M&E indices. In a large antiretroviral therapy (ART) program in western Kenya, we assessed the impact of LTFU on estimating patient mortality among 8,977 adult clients of whom, 3,624 were LTFU. Overall, dropouts were more likely male (36.8% versus 33.7%; p = 0.003), and younger than non-dropouts (35.3 versus 35.7 years old; p = 0.020), with lower median CD4 count at enrollment (160 versus 189 cells/ml; p<0.001) and WHO stage 3–4 disease (47.5% versus 41.1%; p<0.001). Urban clinic clients were 75.0% of non-dropouts but 70.3% of dropouts (p<0.001). Of the 3,624 dropouts, 1,143 were sought and 621 had their vital status ascertained. Statistical techniques were used to adjust mortality estimates based on information obtained from located LTFU patients. Observed mortality estimates one year after enrollment were 1.7% (95% CI 1.3%–2.0%), revised to 2.8% (2.3%–3.1%) when deaths discovered through outreach were added and adjusted to 9.2% (7.8%–10.6%) and 9.9% (8.4%–11.5%) through statistical modeling depending on the method used. The estimates 12 months after ART initiation were 1.7% (1.3%–2.2%), 3.4% (2.9%–4.0%), 10.5% (8.7%–12.3%) and 10.7% (8.9%–12.6%) respectively. Assessment of the impact of LTFU is critical in program M&E as estimated mortality based on passive monitoring may underestimate true mortality by up to 80%. This bias can be ameliorated by tracing a sample of dropouts and statistically adjust the mortality estimates to properly evaluate and guide large HIV care and treatment programs.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sexual and reproductive health in HIV-related proposals supported by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and MalariaBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2009
- Eearly loss of HIV-infected patients on potent antiretroviral therapy programmes in lower-income countriesBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2008
- Overestimates of Survival after HAART: Implications for Global Scale-Up EffortsPLOS ONE, 2008
- Patient Retention in Antiretroviral Therapy Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic ReviewPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Rapid Scale-up of Antiretroviral Therapy at Primary Care Sites in ZambiaJAMA, 2006
- The Survival Benefits of AIDS Treatment in the United StatesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Effective therapy has altered the spectrum of cause-specific mortality following HIV seroconversionAIDS, 2006
- Viability and effectiveness of large-scale HIV treatment initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa: experience from western KenyaAIDS, 2006
- Cohort Profile: Antiretroviral Therapy in Lower Income Countries (ART-LINC): international collaboration of treatment cohortsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Impact of Missing Data Due to Dropouts on Estimates of the Treatment Effect in a Randomized Trial of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-Infected IndividualsJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1996