Surface Properties of Impregnated Mixed Oxide Catalysts
- 1 July 1974
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie
- Vol. 407 (1) , 98-108
- https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19744070111
Abstract
The results of a comparative study of nickel oxide‐alumina and nickel oxide‐silica alumina catalysts in the light of the characteristics of the support systems alumina and silica‐alumina are presented. The impregnation of NiO does not produce any significant change in the textural characteristics like surface area and pore volume of the support oxides. However the deposited nickel oxide leads to the modification of the surface acidity determined by Hammett indicators. In the case of parent oxides the ammonia adsorption is strong (from heat of adsorption measurement) for alumina and silica‐alumina, though for the former it is slightly stronger at comparable surface coverages. But the adsorption of ammonia on NiOAl2O3 is weak while it is strong on NiO/SiO2Al2O3 at the same comparable surface coverages. The reduction in acidity is reflected in the poor dehydration and absence of skeletal isomerisation on NiO impregnated catalysts.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Catalytic aluminas II. Catalytic properties of eta and gamma aluminaJournal of Catalysis, 1964
- The measurement of catalyst acidity using indicators forming stable surface carbonium ions*1Journal of Catalysis, 1963
- The Structure of Nickel Oxide-Alumina Catalysts and the Activity for Cetane-Steam ReactionBulletin of The Japan Petroleum Institute, 1963
- Alumina: Catalyst and Support. XI.1 Mechanism of Dehydration of Aliphatic Alcohols and the Formation of Cyclopropanes during Dehydration2Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1961
- SURFACE HYDROXYL GROUPS ON γ-ALUMINA1The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1960
- Acidity of Catalyst Surfaces. II. Amine Titration Using Hammett IndicatorsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1957
- VALENCE INDUCTIVITYJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1948