Upper bounds for type I and type II error rates in conditional power calculations
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Vol. 19 (10) , 3571-3584
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929008830398
Abstract
Stochastic curtailment procedures are used to monitor accumulating data in long term clinical trials. These procedures allow one to calculate the conditional probability under H0 (or alternative hypothesis, Ha) given current data, of rejecting (accepting) H0 at the end of the trial. One might stop early and reject (accept) H0 if this probability is equal to or greater than γ (γ'). Lan, Simon and Halperin (1982) have shown that if α and β are the type I and type II errors , respectively, then the type I (type II) error using a stochastic curtailment method is equal to or less than α/γ (β/γ'). This upper bound is based on an unlimited number of interim looks. In fact, there are usually a small number of looks. Lower upper bounds using only the standard normal distribution table are presented. A computer program to obtain these bounds is available from the authors.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring versus interim analysis of clinical trials: A perspective from the pharmaceutical industryControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Stopping rules versus conditional powerControlled Clinical Trials, 1988
- Interim analyses in clinical trials: Classical vs. bayesian approachesStatistics in Medicine, 1985
- Statistical aspects of early termination in the beta-blocker heart attack trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- An aid to data monitoring in long-term clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982
- A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality resultsJAMA, 1982
- Early Decision in a Censored Wilcoxon Two-Sample Test for Accumulating Survival DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1969
- Closed sequential tests for binomial probabilitiesBiometrika, 1966
- Early Decision in the Wilcoxon Two-Sample TestJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963