Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation for Neck and Shoulder Pain Among Working Age Adults
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 26 (2) , 174-181
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200101150-00012
Abstract
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. To evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs for neck and shoulder pain require substantial staff and financial resources. They are widely used, despite questionable evidence of their effectiveness. The reviewed randomized controlled and controlled trials appraising the effectiveness of biopsychosocial rehabilitation for working age patients with neck and shoulder pain were identified by searching electronic bibliographic databases, checking references, and consulting experts in the rehabilitation field. Four blinded reviewers selected the trials. Two specialists on rehabilitation evaluated the clinical relevance. Two other blinded reviewers extracted the data and assessed the main results and the methodologic quality of the studies. A qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate the level of scientific evidence. After 1808 abstracts and the references of 65 reviews were screened, only two relevant studies were found that satisfied the criteria. One of these was considered a methodologically low-quality randomized controlled trial, and the other was a methodologically low-quality controlled clinical trial. The clinical relevance of included studies was satisfactory. The level of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain was limited. There appears to be little scientific evidence for the effectiveness on neck and shoulder pain of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation compared with other rehabilitation methods. There is an urgent need for high-quality trials in this field.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS ON NECK PAIN AND TREATMENT EFFICACY. A REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1999
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headachePain, 1999
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- The role of adjunctive therapy in the management of chronic nonmalignant painThe American Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Controlled two year follow up of rehabilitation for disorders in the neck and shoulders.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1994
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Does Nonsurgical Pain Center Treatment of Chronic Pain Return Patients to Work?Spine, 1994
- The role of stretch-based relaxation in the treatment of chronic neck tensionBehavior Therapy, 1992
- Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic reviewPain, 1992
- Physiotherapy exercises and back pain: a blinded review.BMJ, 1991