Five Myths of Active Portfolio Management
- 30 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by With Intelligence LLC in The Journal of Portfolio Management
- Vol. 31 (3) , 27-31
- https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2005.500350
Abstract
Five myths are debunked here. It is not true that: the return investors earn in an actively managed fund measures the skill level of the manager; the average active manager is not skilled and therefore does not add value; if managers are skilled their returns should persist—they should be able to consistently beat the market; in light of evidence that there is little or no persistence in actively managed funds' returns, investors who pick funds on the basis of past returns are not behaving rationally; and finally, because most active managers' compensation does not depend on the return they generate, their compensation is not performance–based.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational MarketsJournal of Political Economy, 2004
- On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual FundsThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Active Management that Adds ValueThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 1994