Preparation for Labor: A Historical Perspective
- 1 May 1979
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Psychosomatic Medicine
- Vol. 41 (3) , 243-258
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197905000-00007
Abstract
A historical analysis of the literature pertaining to psychoprophylaxis demonstrates that contemporary treatment methods have diverse and complex origins. Although many training manuals are presented as outlines of the Lamaze method, historical evidence indicates that Grantly Dick-Read, an English obstetrician, made the most substantive contributions to this area. Although Fernand Lamaze is generally regarded as the pre-eminent authority on psychoprophylaxis, a comparison of his 1958 text with the original Soviet source demonstrates that he deleted and modified substantial portions of the treatment regimen and failed to keep abreast of developments in Soviet theory. Neither Dick-Read, Velvovsky et al. or Lamaze present data which permit cause and effect conclusions regarding treatment and outcome. By the same token, none of these authors demonstrated interest in the empirical validation of their theories regarding pain, anxiety or fear reduction.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The relationship of maternal anxiety, plasma catecholamines, and plasma cortisol to progress in laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1978
- NATURAL CHILDBIRTH - REVIEW AND ANALYSIS1978
- MATERNAL AND FETAL OUTCOME OF LAMAZE-PREPARED PATIENTS1978
- Pain and pain control.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Effect of Psychoprophylaxis (Lamaze Preparation) on Labor and Delivery in PrimiparasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- THEORIES OF PSYCHOPROPHYLAXIS IN OBSTETRICS (PROPHYLAXIS OR THERAPY)American Journal of Psychiatry, 1963
- DYSFUNCTIONAL LABOR .1. PROLONGED LATENT PHASE IN NULLIPARA1961