Payday Loan Pricing
Preprint
- 14 January 2009
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We estimate the pricing determinants for 35,098 payday loans originated in Colorado between 2000 and 2006, and generate a number of results with implications for public policy. We find evidence consistent with classical price competition early in the sample, but as time passed these competitive effects faded and the data become more consistent with a variety of strategic pricing practices. On average, loan prices moved upward toward the legislated price ceiling over time, consistent with implicit collusion facilitated by price focal points. Large multi-store payday firms tended to charge higher prices than independent single-store operators, but were less likely to exploit inelastic demand near military bases and in largely minority neighborhoods. Of the three loan pricing measures used in our analysis, the annual percentage interest rate (APR) favored by regulators and analysts performed poorly.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulation of Consumer Credit Business by the Financial Conduct AuthorityPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2014
- The Real Costs of Credit Access: Evidence from the Payday Lending Market*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2011
- Payday Holiday: How Households Fare After Payday Credit BansSSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
- Defining and Detecting Predatory LendingSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Payday Lenders: Heroes or Villains?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Payday Lending: Evolution, Issues, and EvidencePublished by Springer Nature ,2007
- Measuring the individual-level effects of access to credit: Evidence from payday loansPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2006
- Price Ceilings as Focal Points for Tacit Collusion: Evidence from Credit CardsAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business DataThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979