PREDICTING NET NITROGEN MINERALIZATION OVER A GROWING SEASON: MODEL VERIFICATION
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Soil Science
- Vol. 68 (3) , 537-552
- https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss88-052
Abstract
In a previous study a nitrogen mineralization model was developed by combining the potentially mineralizable nitrogen (No) with functions representing the effect of temperature and soil moisture on the mineralization rate constant (k). The model performed well in predicting the amount of net nitrogen mineralized during a growing season when soil was incubated in plastic bags placed in incubators or buried in the field. In the present study a similar model was used to estimate net nitrogen mineralized in situ from Wood Mountain loam an Orthic Brown soil at Swift Current, Saskatchewan under (a) summerfallow, (b) cropped-dryland and (c) cropped-irrigated conditions. Model output showed good agreement to field measurements especially for the first 45–60 d, but thereafter tended to underestimate the measured data particularly under cropped-dryland conditions. During a growing season the cropped-irrigated system predicted 69 kg ha−1 net nitrogen mineralized, but 81 kg ha−1 was measured; the corresponding values for summerfallow were 64 and 86 kg ha−1, and for cropped-dryland 36 and 52 kg ha−1, respectively. The model is not dynamic since it does not allow for No to be replenished continuously by nitrogen derived from decomposition of fresh residues and rhizosphere microbial biomass. Net nitrogen mineralized from this source might explain at least part of the underestimate predicted by the model. Other sources of possible discrepancy could be imprecision in measuring the mineralization of nitrogen and in estimating the parameters in the model. Nonetheless, it was established that one of the main shortcomings of the model was that it underestimated the amount of nitrogen mineralized whenever the soil became very dry and was then rewetted by rainfall. This was probably because the latter process resulted in large flushes in mineral nitrogen in situ while in the laboratory estimate of No and k, this effect is not adequately simulated. Key words: Q10, No, N mineralization, rate constant, temperature functionKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimized N-mineralization parameters of loess soils from incubation experimentsPlant and Soil, 1982
- CHANGES IN MINERAL N AND NUMBERS OF BACTERIA AND ACTINOMYCETES DURING TWO YEARS UNDER WHEAT-FALLOW IN SOUTHWESTERN SASKATCHEWANCanadian Journal of Soil Science, 1982
- QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NET NITROGEN MINERALIZATION AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOILSCanadian Journal of Soil Science, 1982
- Predicting Nitrogen Mineralization in Chaparral SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1981
- Potentially mineralizable nitrogen, decomposition rates and their relationship to temperature for five Queensland soilsSoil Research, 1981
- Nitrogen Mineralization as Affected by Soil Moisture, Temperature, and DepthSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1980
- EFFECTS OF FERTILIZER N AND SOIL MOISTURE ON MINERALIZATION, N RECOVERY AND A-VALUES, UNDER SPRING WHEAT GROWN IN SMALL LYSIMETERSCanadian Journal of Soil Science, 1978
- EFFECTS OF FERTILIZER N AND SOIL MOISTURE ON GROWTH, N CONTENT, AND MOISTURE USE BY SPRING WHEATCanadian Journal of Soil Science, 1977
- EQUIPMENT AND METHOD FOR ISOLATING SOIL CORESCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1977
- Residual Nitrate and Mineralizable Soil Nitrogen in Relation to Nitrogen Uptake by Irrigated Sugarbeets1Agronomy Journal, 1977