Abstract
In recent years, more and more discussions have arisen with regard to the role of (partially) hydrolyzed formulas as standard feedings for infants with a high risk to have allergy. This review is based on an extensive overview of the literature dealing with the subjects of allergy prevention and hydrolyzed formulas. Although breast-feeding should receive absolute priority in the nutrition of infants, the existence of artificial milk formulas as an addition to or replacement of breast milk is a necessity. In high-risk infants with a family history of allergy, we might consider a hypoallergenic formula instead of the classical start formulas to reduce the risk of allergy. From a nutritional point of view, these formulas should only be hydrolyzed as much as necessary. On the other hand, for the treatment of food allergies, the peptides of the semi-elementary infant formulas should be as short as possible. This can, however, have an impact on the nutritional value of the formula. Therefore, a difference is made between partial and complete hydrolysates. While a firm recommendation is not yet possible, physicians might consider partial hydrolysate formulas in high-risk infants if parents can afford the higher-cost option.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: