What Happened to the Agrarian Bourgeoisie and Rural Proletariat under Monopoly Capitalism?
- 1 July 1981
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acta Sociologica
- Vol. 24 (3) , 167-191
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000169938102400303
Abstract
The classical conception of the development of capitalism in agriculture maintains that, as in industry, the agrarian class-structure will tend to polarize, the petty commodity producer will tend to disappear, and a capitalist relation of production will develop between an agrarian bourgeoisie and a rural proletanat. Farms will be big estates, managed by capitahst farmers, run with machinery and landless labourers. This con ception has proved to be unjustified. The classics of Marxism are discus sed in order to find out the assumptions underlying this conception of agricultural development. The findings are used in a discussion of the prospects of a development in accordance with the classical conception in contemporary peripheral agriculture.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Household production and the national economy: Concepts for the analysis of Agrarian formationsThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1980
- Neo‐populism and Marxism: The Chayanovian view of the agrarian question and its fundamental fallacyThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1979
- Feudal Relics or Capitalist Monuments? Notes on the Sociology of Unfree LabourSociology, 1977
- Lenin on the Agrarian QuestionSocial Scientist, 1977
- The development of capitalism in South African agriculture: clas struggle in the countrysideEconomy and Society, 1976
- Summary of selected parts of Kautsky'sEconomy and Society, 1976
- Chayanov and the economics of the Russian PeasantryThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1975
- Propriété foncière et mode de production capitalisteEtudes Rurales, 1973
- Théorie économique du système féodalPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1970