Inferences About the Location of Food in the Great Apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus).
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Comparative Psychology
- Vol. 118 (2) , 232-241
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.232
Abstract
Bonobos (Pan paniscus; n = 4), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes; n = 12), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla; n = 8), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus; n = 6) were presented with 2 cups (1 baited) and given visual or auditory information about their contents. Visual information consisted of letting subjects look inside the cups. Auditory information consisted of shaking the cup so that the baited cup produced a rattling sound. Subjects correctly selected the baited cup both when they saw or heard the food. Nine individuals were above chance in both visual and auditory conditions. More important, subjects as a group selected the baited cup when only the empty cup was either shown or shaken, which means that subjects chose correctly without having seen or heard the food (i.e., inference by exclusion). Control tests showed that subjects were not more attracted to noisy cups, avoided shaken noiseless cups, or learned to use auditory information as a cue during the study. It is concluded that subjects understood that the food caused the noise, not simply that the noise was associated with the food.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chimpanzee social cognitionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2001
- Do apes and children know what they have seen?Animal Cognition, 2001
- Cues that chimpanzees do and do not use to find hidden objectsAnimal Cognition, 2000
- Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1998
- Comprehension of Novel Communicative Signs by Apes and Human ChildrenChild Development, 1997
- The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 1996
- Cues, convergence and a curmudgeon: a reply to PovinelliAnimal Behaviour, 1994
- Levels of causal understanding in chimpanzees and childrenCognition, 1994
- TESTS FOR CONTROL BY EXCLUSION AND NEGATIVE STIMULUS RELATIONS OF ARBITRARY MATCHING TO SAMPLE IN A “SYMMETRY‐EMERGENT” CHIMPANZEEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1993
- EMERGENCE OF SYMMETRY IN A VISUAL CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION BY CHIMPANZEES (PAN TROGLODYTES)Psychological Reports, 1991