TESTING POVERTY LINES
- 15 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Review of Income and Wealth
- Vol. 52 (3) , 399-421
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00196.x
Abstract
In theory, a poverty line can be defined as the cost of a common (inter‐personally comparable) utility level across a population. But how can one know if this holds in practice? For groups sharing common consumption needs but facing different prices, the theory of revealed preference can be used to derive testable implications of utility consistency knowing only the “poverty bundles” and their prices. Heterogeneity in needs calls for extra information. We argue that subjective welfare data offer a credible means of testing utility consistency across different needs groups. A case study of Russia's official poverty lines shows how revealed preference tests can be used in conjunction with qualitative information on needs heterogeneity. The results lead us to question the utility consistency of Russia's official poverty lines.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robustness of subjective welfare analysis in a poor developing country: Madagascar 2001The Journal of Development Studies, 2006
- Identifying Welfare Effects from Subjective QuestionsEconomica, 2001
- How to Compare Apples And Oranges: Poverty Measurement Based on Different Definitions of ConsumptionReview of Income and Wealth, 2001
- Measuring Poverty Using Qualitative Perceptions of Consumption AdequacyThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2000
- RELATIVE OR ABSOLUTE POVERTY LINES: A NEW APPROACHReview of Income and Wealth, 2000
- How Robust Is a Poverty Profile?The World Bank Economic Review, 1994
- Some Methodological Issues in the Implementation of Subjective Poverty DefinitionsThe Journal of Human Resources, 1988
- A SYNTHESIS OF POVERTY LINE DEFINITIONS*Review of Income and Wealth, 1985
- The Direct Measurement of Welfare Levels: How Much Does it Cost to Make Ends Meet?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1984
- The Poverty Line: Concept and MeasurementThe Journal of Human Resources, 1977