Escitalopram versus venlafaxine XR in the treatment of depression
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 21 (5) , 297-309
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004850-200609000-00008
Abstract
This article reanalyses and reviews data from the two published randomized clinical trials comparing escitalopram and venlafaxine XR in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. The aim was to further compare the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram and venlafaxine XR and to assess the impact of the two treatments on the patient's quality of life, as well as the benefit/risk of treatment. A total of 243 escitalopram-treated patients and 240 venlafaxine XR-treated patients were included in this analysis. Comparable treatment efficacy was achieved with respect to the prospectively defined primary efficacy endpoint (mean change from baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 8). An analysis of the outcome at the end of study by baseline severity showed that the treatment difference became greater the more severely depressed the patients were at baseline. At the highest permitted doses, in the subgroup of patients who were severely depressed (baseline MADRS ≥30), patients treated with escitalopram had a statistically significantly greater improvement (P<0.05) in mean MADRS total scores than patients treated with venlafaxine XR at endpoint. For these patients, treatment with 20 mg/day escitalopram resulted in a statistically significantly (P<0.05) higher remission rate at week 8 (47%) than treatment with venlafaxine XR (29%). This difference was confirmed by the analysis of the pooled data, which showed that patients in the escitalopram group had a significantly (P<0.05) higher mean number of depression-free days (30.4 days) than those in the venlafaxine XR group (26.2 days) over the 8-week period. The relative benefit of escitalopram versus venlafaxine XR was 1.46, indicating that a patient was more likely to benefit from treatment with escitalopram. The proportions of patients who withdrew owing to adverse events were 7.5% in the escitalopram group and 11.2% in the venlafaxine XR group. The mean number of discontinuation emergent signs and symptoms in the venlafaxine XR group (mean: 5.0) was significantly (P<0.001) higher than for the escitalopram group (mean: 2.4).Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The S-enantiomer of R,S-citalopram, increases inhibitor binding to the human serotonin transporter by an allosteric mechanism. Comparison with other serotonin transporter inhibitorsEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2005
- A double-blind comparison of escitalopram and venlafaxine extended release in the treatment of major depressive disorder.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2004
- Comparison of escitalopram and citalopram efficacy: A meta-analysisInternational Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 2003
- Global Benefit-risk Evaluation of Antidepressant Action: Comparison of Pooled Data for Venlafaxine, SSRIs, and PlaceboCNS Spectrums, 2002
- Global benefit-risk assessment of antidepressants: venlafaxine XR and fluoxetine.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2002
- Antidepressant use patterns in clinical practices: comparisons among tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2000
- Comparison of the effects of venlafaxine, desipramine, and paroxetine on noradrenaline‐ and methoxamine‐evoked constriction of the dorsal hand veinBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1999
- Comparison of the effects of venlafaxine, paroxetine and desipramine on the pupillary light reflex in man.Psychopharmacology, 1999
- Escitalopram dose–response revisited: an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of escitalopram compared to citalopram and placebo in patients with major depressionInternational Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 1999
- EuroQol: the current state of playHealth Policy, 1996