Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung Cancer
- 21 December 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 299 (25) , 1397-1401
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197812212992506
Abstract
Patients with lung cancer can be treated by either surgical extirpation or radiation. The former may offer increased five-year survival and prolonged life expectancies as compared to the latter, but subjects patients to the immediate risk of thoracotomy. We interviewed patients with "operable" lung cancer and found that they were quite averse to taking risks involving the possibility of immediate death. When these data about patients' attitudes were combined with data about survival after both radiation therapy and operation, it appeared that radiotherapy would be the preferred therapeutic plan for several of these patients. These results emphasize the importance of choosing therapies not only on the basis of objective measures of survival but also on the basis of patient attitudes. (N Engl J Med 299:1397–1401, 1978)This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Operative mortality and five year survival rates in patients with bronchogenic carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1974
- A SYSTEM FOR THE CLINICAL STAGING OF LUNG CANCERAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1974
- Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1969