A Controlled Trial To Increase Detection and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Older Patients with a Wrist Fracture
- 7 September 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 141 (5) , 366-373
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-5-200409070-00011
Abstract
Despite the high risk for future fractures and the availability of effective treatments, fewer than 10% to 20% of patients who sustain a fragility fracture are tested or treated for osteoporosis. To improve rates of testing and treatment for osteoporosis in patients with wrist fractures who are seen in the emergency department. Nonrandomized, controlled trial with blinded ascertainment of outcomes. Emergency departments in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Persons 50 years of age or older who were treated for a wrist fracture and their physicians. Patients admitted to the hospital or treated for osteoporosis were excluded. Overall, 572 consecutive patients with fractures were screened, and 102 patients (55 intervention, 47 control) and 101 physicians were studied. The primary end point was the prescription of osteoporosis treatment 6 months after fracture. Secondary end points included rates of testing for bone mineral density and patients' knowledge, satisfaction, and quality of life. Faxed physician reminders that contained osteoporosis treatment guidelines endorsed by local opinion leaders and patient education. Control patients received usual care and information about falls and home safety. The median patient age was 66 years. Most patients were female (78%) and white (79%); 70% of patients reported a previous fracture, and 22% had a fall with injury in the previous year. The intervention increased the rates of testing for bone mineral density to 62% (vs. 17% for controls; adjusted relative increase, 3.6 [P < 0.001]) and the rates of osteoporosis treatment to 40% (vs. 10% for controls; adjusted relative increase, 3.8 [P = 0.002]) within 6 months of fracture. Intervention patients were more likely to report a diagnosis of osteoporosis, but other patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. This was a small, nonrandomized, controlled study with process-based outcomes. In a multifaceted intervention directed at patients and their physicians, the rates of testing and treatment for osteoporosis after emergency department care for a fragility fracture were more than 3 times those of controls.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low Frequency of Treatment of Osteoporosis Among Postmenopausal Women Following a FractureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2003
- Pins and Plaster Aren’t Enough: A Call for the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Osteoporotic FracturesJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2003
- Early effects of raloxifene on clinical vertebral fractures at 12 months in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2002
- Osteoporosis follow-up after wrist fractures following minor trauma.Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
- Treatment of Osteoporosis: Are Physicians Missing an Opportunity?*†Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2000
- Effect of Local Medical Opinion Leaders on Quality of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled TrialSurvey of Anesthesiology, 1999
- Prescribing by general practitioners after an osteoporotic fractureAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1998
- Colles' Fracture of the Wrist as an Indicator of Underlying Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: A Prospective Study of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover RateOsteoporosis International, 1998
- Development and Validation of a Discriminative Quality of Life Questionnaire for Osteoporosis (The OPTQoL)Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Fracture of the distal forearm as a forecaster of subsequent hip fracture: A population-based cohort study with 24 years of follow-upCalcified Tissue International, 1993