The Quiescent Counterpart of the Soft Gamma‐Ray Repeater SGR 0526−66
- 10 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 585 (2) , 948-954
- https://doi.org/10.1086/346110
Abstract
It is now commonly believed that soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) are magnetars—neutron stars powered by their magnetic fields. However, what differentiates these two seemingly dissimilar objects is, at present, unknown. We present Chandra observations of RX J052600.3-660433, the quiescent X-ray counterpart of SGR 0526-66, famous for the intense burst of 1979 March 5. The source is unresolved at the resolution of Chandra. Restricting observations to a period range around 8 s, the period noted in the afterglow of the burst of 1979 March 5, we find evidence for a similar periodicity in two epochs of data obtained 20 months apart. The secular period derivative based on these two observations is 6.6(5) × 10-11 s s-1, similar to the period derivatives of the magnetars. As is the case with other magnetars, the spectrum is best fitted by a combination of a blackbody and a power law. However, quite surprisingly, the photon index of the power-law component is Γ ~ 3—intermediate to those of AXPs and SGRs. This continuum of Γ led us to suggest that the underlying physical parameter that differentiates SGRs from AXPs is manifested in the power-law component. Two decades ago, SGR 0526-66 was a classical SGR, whereas now it behaves like an AXP. Thus, it is possible that the same object cycles between the SGR and AXP states. We speculate that the main difference between AXPs and SGRs is the geometry of the B fields, and this geometry is time dependent. Finally, given the steep spectrum of RX J052600.3-660433, the total radiated energy of RX J052600.3-660433 can be much higher than traditionally estimated. If this energy is supplied by the decay of the magnetic field, then the inferred B field of RX J052600.3-660433 is in excess of 1015 G, the traditional value for magnetars. Independent of this discussion, there could well be a class of neutron stars, 1014 G B 1015 G, which are neither radio pulsars nor magnetars.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anomalous X‐Ray Pulsars and Soft Gamma‐Ray Repeaters in Supernova RemnantsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- The Giant Flare of 1998 August 27 from SGR 1900+14. I. An Interpretive Study ofBeppoSAXandUlyssesObservationsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- Discovery of Two High Magnetic Field Radio PulsarsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2000
- Neon Line Emission in the X-Ray Spectrum of the Pulsar 4U 1626−67The Astrophysical Journal, 1995
- Timing behavior of 96 radio pulsarsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1994
- Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 2nd ed.American Journal of Physics, 1993
- Photoelectric absorption cross sections with variable abundancesThe Astrophysical Journal, 1992
- Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - Implications for gamma-ray burstsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1992
- Location of the gamma-ray transient event of 1979 March 5The Astrophysical Journal, 1980
- Detection of a fast, intense and unusual gamma-ray transientThe Astrophysical Journal, 1980