Medigap Reform Legislation of 1990: A 10-Year Review
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Vol. 24 (3) , 121-137
Abstract
The 1990 Medigap reform legislation sought to make it easier for consumers to compare policies, provide market stability, promote competition, and avoid adverse selection. Evidence is that the standardization of benefits has simplified consumer choice and is strongly supported by consumers and State regulators. The 1990 reforms also decreased carrier and agent abuses. However, loss ratios (the proportion of premiums paid in benefits versus being retained for administration and profit) have changed little since 1990, bringing into question whether price competition has been enhanced. The prescription drug benefit, which is included in 3 of the 10 standardized plans, provides only limited financial protection yet is expensive, one reason being adverse selection. Access to coverage for Medicare disabled beneficiaries is problematic in most States.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Growing Differences Between Medicare Beneficiaries With And Without Drug CoverageHealth Affairs, 2001
- Should Medicare HMO Benefits Be Standardized?Health Affairs, 1999
- The impact of policy standardization on the Medigap market.1997
- Impact of Medicare SELECT on Cost and Utilization in 11 States1997
- Effects of Supplemental Coverage on Use of Services by Medicare Enrollees1997
- Medigap Reform Legislation of 1990: Have the Objectives Been Met?1996
- Private health insurance and medical care utilization: evidence from the Medicare population.1991
- Acute Health Care Costs for the Aged Medicare Population: Overview and Policy OptionsThe Milbank Quarterly, 1987
- The extent of ownership and the characteristics of Medicare supplemental policies.1985