Moral Judgment, Authoritarianism, and Ethnocentrism
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 129 (1) , 37-45
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9711697
Abstract
Although much has been written about the moral basis of authoritarianism, empirical research on the relationship between moral judgment level and authoritarian and ethnocentric attitudes has been sparse. In this study, I hypothesized that higher levels of moral judgment are related to anti-authoritarian and anti-ethnocentric attitudes, whereas lower moral levels predict the presence of authoritarian and ethnocentric opinions. Dutch university students (n = 126) and high school students (n = 88) completed the Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure (SROM) and scales for authoritarianism and ethnocentrism. Results in the two samples converge: Moral judgment level indeed appears to be related to authoritarianism in the expected direction and—to a lesser extent—to ethnocentrism as well.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moral Judgment and Concern about Nuclear WarYouth & Society, 1987
- Patriotism, Racism, and the Disutility of the Ethnocentrism ConceptThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1985
- Construction and Validation of a Multiple-Choice Measure of Moral ReasoningChild Development, 1984
- Alternatives to the F Scale in the Measurement of Authoritarianism: A CatalogThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1984
- Half of All Authoritarians Are Left Wing: A Reply to Eysenck and StonePolitical Psychology, 1983
- Moral Development, Youthful Activism and Modern SocietyYouth & Society, 1969