General and targeted statistical potentials for protein–ligand interactions
Top Cited Papers
- 16 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 61 (2) , 272-287
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20588
Abstract
We present a novel atom–atom potential derived from a database of protein–ligand complexes. First, we clarify the similarities and differences between two statistical potentials described in the literature, PMF and Drugscore. We highlight shortcomings caused by an important factor unaccounted for in their reference states, and describe a new potential, which we name the Astex Statistical Potential (ASP). ASP's reference state considers the difference in exposure of protein atom types towards ligand binding sites. We show that this new potential predicts binding affinities with an accuracy similar to that of Goldscore and Chemscore. We investigate the influence of the choice of reference state by constructing two additional statistical potentials that differ from ASP only in this respect. The reference states in these two potentials are defined along the lines of Drugscore and PMF. In docking experiments, the potential using the new reference state proposed for ASP gives better success rates than when these literature reference states were used; a success rate similar to the established scoring functions Goldscore and Chemscore is achieved with ASP. This is the case both for a large, general validation set of protein–ligand structures and for small test sets of actives against four pharmaceutically relevant targets. Virtual screening experiments for these targets show less discrimination between the different reference states in terms of enrichment. In addition, we describe how statistical potentials can be used in the construction of targeted scoring functions. Examples are given for cdk2, using four different targeted scoring functions, biased towards increasingly large target‐specific databases. Using these targeted scoring functions, docking success rates as well as enrichments are significantly better than for the general ASP scoring function. Results improve with the number of structures used in the construction of the target scoring functions, thus illustrating that these targeted ASP potentials can be continuously improved as new structural data become available. Proteins 2005.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Approaches to the Description and Prediction of the Binding Affinity of Small-Molecule Ligands to Macromolecular ReceptorsAngewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 2002
- A review of protein-small molecule docking methodsJournal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2002
- Automated flexible ligand docking method and its application for database searchJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1997
- Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. CohenJournal of Molecular Biology, 1997
- A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction AlgorithmJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic MoleculesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1995
- Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1995
- Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealingProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 1990
- The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambinJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1988
- CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculationsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1983