Effects of Self-Imposition and Experimenter Imposition of Achievement Standards on Performance
- 1 August 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 45 (1) , 119-122
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.45.1.119
Abstract
This research assessed the effects of imposition of achievement standards on crank-turning within conditions in which apparent reinforcements were present. Subjects were assigned to one of four experimental conditions: self-imposition of achievement standards, experimenter's imposition of achievement standards, apparatus-feedback control, and baserate control. A steady decline in cranking over the period was noted. Subjects given experimenter's standards cranked faster than did subjects in the baserate condition but did not differ significantly from subjects in the apparatus-feedback condition. Subjects under self-imposition cranked faster than did subjects in any other conditions.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Evaluation of Ten Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures by Monte Carlo MethodsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1973
- Effects of the value of contingent self-administered and noncontingent externally imposed reward on children’s behavioral productivityPsychonomic Science, 1970
- ACADEMIC RESPONSE RATE AS A FUNCTION OF TEACHER‐ AND SELF‐IMPOSED CONTINGENCIESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969
- Relative efficacy of self-monitored and externally imposed reinforcement systems.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967