Truth‐telling versus hope: A dilemma in practice

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper presents a brief outline of the attributes and therapeutic nature of hope in the context of truth-telling. It is suggested that, in some circumstances, withholding the truth to protect hope can be considered a morally acceptable option when truth-telling has the potential to destroy hope’s therapeutic effects. A clinical vignette that highlights how the practitioner can be confronted with a clash of principles is presented. The possible consequences of both truth-telling and the withholding of truth are discussed and the moral positions of the health-care professionals involved are examined. This article is intended to provide a framework for discussion/group work, particularly at undergraduate level.