The angiogenic ?vascular endothelial growth factor/flk-1(KDR) receptor? pathway in patients with endometrial carcinoma
- 15 November 2001
- Vol. 92 (10) , 2569-2577
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20011115)92:10<2569::aid-cncr1609>3.0.co;2-3
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important endothelial cell mitogen associated with increased angiogenesis and aggressive tumor behavior. Its stimulating effect on endothelial cells basically is dependent on the presence of specific VEGF receptors, such as the flk-1(KDR) receptor. This study investigates the roles of VEGF and of a functionally intact angiogenic pathway, “VEGF/flk-1(KDR),” in patients with endometrial carcinoma and their significance in prognosis and therapy. A series of 121 endometrial carcinomas were studied. The expression of VEGF by endometrial tumor cells was assessed using the monoclonal antibody (MoAb) VG1. VEGF/KDR complexes on tumor endothelium or activated microvessel density (aMVD) were identified using the MoAb 11B5. In addition, the standard microvessel density (sMVD) was assessed with anti-CD31. In all tumors, the alkaline phosphatase/antialkaline phosphatase technique was employed. A Fisher exact test or an unpaired, two-tailed t test was used for testing correlations between categoric tumor variables, whereas a log-rank test was used to determine statistical differences between life tables. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of tumor variables on overall survival. Cytoplasmic VEGF expression in > 50% of tumor cells was associated significantly with aMVD (P < 0.0001) and with sMVD (P < 0.003). In univariate survival analysis, VEGF (P = 0.0002), aMVD (P = 0.001), and sMVD (P = 0.0009) were significant prognostic variables. Equally important were the histologic parameters tumor type (P = 0.03), tumor grade (P = 0.003), and disease stage (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, disease stage was the most important independent prognostic factor (P < 0.0001), followed by VEGF/KDR (P < 0.01), and VEGF (P < 0.04). Furthermore, VEGF and VEGF/KDR were the only independent prognostic variables for patients with Stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma. sMVD and the angiogenic factor VEGF are important indicators of a poor prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. VEGF/KDR complexes define a subgroup of patients with endometrial carcinoma with an even worse prognosis. Cancer 2001;92:2569–77. © 2001 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The angiogenic pathway ?vascular endothelial growth factor/flk-1(KDR)-receptor? in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritisThe Journal of Pathology, 2001
- Angiogenic Interactions of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, of Thymidine Phosphorylase, and of p53 Protein Expression in Locally Advanced Gastric CancerOncology Research, 2001
- Vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor expression are implicated in the angiogenesis of endometrial cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2000
- Tumor specific activation of the VEGF/KDR angiogenic pathway in a subset of locally advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinomas.Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2000
- VEGF, flt-1, and KDR/flk-1 as Prognostic Indicators in Endometrial CarcinomaGynecologic Oncology, 2000
- Expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its mRNA in uterine endometrial cancersCancer Letters, 1998
- Tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer: Its importance as a prognostic indicator and the association with vascular endothelial growth factor expressionBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1995
- Identification and Localization of Alternately Spliced mRNAs for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Human Uterus and Estrogen Regulation in Endometrial Carcinoma Cell Lines1Biology of Reproduction, 1993
- Identification of the KDR tyrosine kinase as a receptor for vascular endothelial cell growth factorBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1992
- The fms -Like Tyrosine Kinase, a Receptor for Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorScience, 1992