“THIN” VERSUS “THICK” MATCHING IN THE MANTEL‐HAENSZEL PROCEDURE FOR DETECTING DIF
Open Access
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in ETS Research Report Series
- Vol. 1992 (2)
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1992.tb01507.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- When Do Item Response Function and Mantel-Haenszel Definitions of Differential Item Functioning Coincide?Journal of Educational Statistics, 1990
- Comparison of the Mantel-Haenszel Test with a Randomized and a Jackknife Test for Detecting Biased ItemsJournal of Educational Statistics, 1990
- Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in the NAEP History AssessmentJournal of Educational Measurement, 1989
- An Empirical Assessment of the Mantel-Haenszel for Studying Differential Item PerformanceApplied Measurement in Education, 1989
- DEMONSTRATING THE UTILITY OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TESTJournal of Educational Measurement, 1986
- The Large-Sample Relative Efficiency of the Mantel-Haenszel Estimator in the Fixed-Strata CaseBiometrics, 1986
- Odds ratio estimators when the data are sparseBiometrika, 1981
- A METHOD OF ASSESSING BIAS IN TEST ITEMSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1979
- An Analysis of the Verbal Scholastic Aptitude Test Using Birnbaum's Three-Parameter Logistic ModelEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1968