Trade-offs Between Defence and Education/Health Expenditures in Developing Countries
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Peace Research
- Vol. 25 (2) , 165-177
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338802500205
Abstract
It is commonly believed that defence expenditures have a particular ability to compete government financial resources away from other activities, especially education and health. This article uses a number of methods to test for the existence and strength of such trade-offs in a large number of LDCs. Cross- sectional analysis of government expenditures found that few countries which were low defence spenders were high spenders on education/health (and vice versa). Defence expenditures were no less vulnerable to overall budget cuts, nor more likely to gain from budget increases than education and health. Finally, a longitudinal regression analysis for twelve Asian countries revealed little evidence of trade-offs We discuss some of the reasons why our analysis may not support the conventional view on trade-offs and, finally, make a number of suggestions concerning future research on this topic.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Austerity and military expenditures in developing countries: The case of VenezuelaSocio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1986
- The determinants of military expenditures in developing countriesWorld Development, 1986
- The Determinants of Defence Expenditure in the ASEAN RegionJournal of Peace Research, 1986
- Response to Lyttkens and VedovatoJournal of Peace Research, 1984
- Opportunity Costs of Defence: A Comment on Dabelko and McCormickJournal of Peace Research, 1984
- Does Spending on Defence Cut Spending on Health?: A Time-Series Analysis of the U.S. Economy 1929–74British Journal of Political Science, 1979
- Opportunity Costs of Defense: Some Cross-National EvidenceJournal of Peace Research, 1977
- Who Pays for Defense?American Political Science Review, 1969