Evidence against surf‐riding as a general mechanism for surface motility

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The mechanism responsible for the energy‐dependent movement of membrane components (ie, surface motility) is unknown. Recently a potentially unifying model, termed “surf‐riding” [Hewitt, 1979] or “surf‐boarding” [Berlin and Oliver, 1982], has been proposed to explain surface motility. Using phase‐contrast light microscopy and membrane surface markers (polystyrene microspheres), we have tested the surf‐riding/surf‐boarding hypothesis on two protozoan systems: the axopodia of the heliozoan Echinosphaerium nucleofilum and the reticulopodial networks of the allogromiid foraminiferans Allogromia laticollaris and Allogromia sp, strain NF. Our evidence indicates that surface motility, as displayed by these organisms, does not occur by a surf‐riding/surf‐boarding mechanism. Previouś observations on surface motility associated with the Chlamydomonas flagellum indicate that this system is also incompatible with the surf‐boarding/surf‐riding hypothesis.