Enumeration of naturalMicrocystispopulations
Open Access
- 1 September 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in British Phycological Journal
- Vol. 13 (3) , 269-277
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00071617800650331
Abstract
Three methods for estimating the cell concentrations of natural, colonial Microcystis populations are described, and the results are compared statistically. Ultrasonic disruption of colonies is most conveniently applied to dense populations and gives results comparable with those obtained by alkaline hydrolysis. Excessive exposure to ultrasonic waves may destroy cells. A regression relating cell concentration to mean colony volume can, subject to conditions described, give crude estimates of Microcystis at low population densities or in mixed populations.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phytoplankton, Zooplankton and Bacteria: Standing Crop and Production Relationships in a Eutrophic LakeOikos, 1977
- Observations and experiments on the phytoplankton of Blelham Tarn, English Lake DistrictFreshwater Biology, 1974
- Growth and buoyancy of Microcystis aeruginosa Kütz. emend. Elenkin in a shallow eutrophic lakeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1973
- Structure and function of gas vacuolesMicrobiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1972
- An investigation of the Coulter Counter in “Biomass” determinations of natural freshwater phytoplankton populationsHydrobiologia, 1970
- A Simple Counting Chamber for Nannoplankton1Limnology and Oceanography, 1959
- The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by countingHydrobiologia, 1958
- Botanical limnological methods with special reference to the algaeThe Botanical Review, 1957
- A sedimentation technique for counting algae and other organismsHydrobiologia, 1951
- The Errors of the Sedgwick-Rafter Counting Chamber in the Enumeration of PhytoplanktonTransactions of the American Microscopical Society, 1942