Labour Market Adjustment to Indonesia's Economic Crisis: Context, Trends and Implications
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies
- Vol. 36 (1) , 105-136
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910012331337803
Abstract
This paper focuses on labour market adjustment during the economic crisis of 1997–98. It shows how labour processes help explain better outcomes for the poor than were initially predicted. The Indonesian experience is viewed in a framework that contrasts two extreme models: a Keynesian world of rigid real wages, and a neoclassical situation of flexible adjustment to economic shocks. It was found that the Indonesian case is more consistent with the neoclassical than the Keynesian model, despite the tendency for greater government intervention in labour markets before the crisis. The paper also finds that the large change in relative prices from the exchange rate depreciation had a smaller effect than expected on employment structure. These conclusions are discussed in the context of major changes in labour markets prior to the economic crisis.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survey of Recent DevelopmentsBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 1999
- Survey of Recent DevelopmentsBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 1999
- Effects of the Indonesian Crisis: Evidence from the Indonesian Family Life SurveyPublished by Rand Corporation ,1999
- The Indonesian Economy in CrisisPublished by Springer Nature ,1999
- The Indonesian CrisisASEAN Economic Bulletin, 1998
- Survey of Recent DevelopmentsBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 1998
- Survey of Recent DevelopmentsBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 1998
- Changing Labor Market Conditions and Economic Development in Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan, ChinaThe World Bank Economic Review, 1994
- Labor markets in an era of adjustment. Vol. 1Published by World Bank ,1994
- Labor Market Institutions and Policies: Help or Hindrance to Economic Development?The World Bank Economic Review, 1992