The scope of neuroethology
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 7 (3) , 367-381
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0001863x
Abstract
Neuroethology, an interdisciplinary subdivision of neuroscience, has emerged in recent years. Since 1976 there has been a regular session under this heading at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience. In 1980 two introductory texts in English were published on the subject (Ewert 1980; Guthrie 1980), and a third (Camhi 1984) was published recently. There is widespread interest in neural mechanisms underlying behavior, but they encompass such a vast array of often unrelated topics that proponents do not share common goals. This article describes the emergence of ethology as a discipline, pointing out that its practitioners were successful because they confined their research to stereotyped, complex, nonlearned, innate behavioral acts. A limited number of profoundly significant principles emerged. Each of these is redefined. The major concepts of earlier ethology were embodied in a simple hydraulic model used by Konrad Lorenz in 1949 (Lorenz 1950). It is pointed out that this model implies the existence of common neurophysiological mechanisms and neuronal circuitry. This model has now been made obsolete by neurophysiological progress, but with appropriate modifications an updated version may still be useful in focusing attention on possible principles. The initial aim of neuroethology should be to examine the neurophysiological events in a variety of behaviors, exhibited by diverse animals from different phyla, which meet the criteria of innate behavioral acts. The behaviors should be sufficiently complex to interest ethologists, yet they should be addressable with neurophysiological methods down to the cellular level. In the case of vertebrates this may mean working with brain slices as well as whole animals, but for some invertebrates recording should be possible in the nearly intact animal during execution of the behavior. The work will be exacting and very difficult, and it is not likely to get done at all unless neuroethologists recognize that they should both train and discipline themselves and restrict their attention to welldefined goals.Keywords
This publication has 146 references indexed in Scilit:
- A neural theory of circadian rhythms: Split rhythms, after-effects and motivational interactionsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1985
- Are central pattern generators understandable?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980
- The stomatogastric nervous system: Structure and function of a small neural networkProgress in Neurobiology, 1976
- Neural factors and evitability in insect behaviorJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1975
- On the dynamics of operant conditioningJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1971
- On the production and release of chemical transmitters and related topics in cellular controlJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1969
- Is modern ethology objective?The British Journal of Animal Behaviour, 1954
- Über die Bildung des InstinktbegriffesThe Science of Nature, 1937
- Betrachtungen über das Erkennen der arteigenen Triebhandlungen der VögelJournal of Ornithology, 1932
- Beobachtungen an DohlenJournal of Ornithology, 1927