Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships: Theory and Evidence
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 55 (3) , 1133-1161
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00243
Abstract
A theory of the optimal number of banking relationships is developed and tested using matched bank‐firm data. According to the theory, relationship banks may be unable to continue funding profitable projects owing to internal problems and a firm may thus have to refinance from nonrelationship banks. The latter, however, face an adverse selection problem, as they do not know the quality of the project, and may refuse to lend. In these circumstances, multiple banking can reduce the probability of an early liquidation of the project. The empirical evidence supports the predictions of the model.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Further evidence on the bank lending process and the capital-market response to bank loan agreementsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Investment and Demand UncertaintyThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- Optimal Debt Structure and the Number of CreditorsJournal of Political Economy, 1996
- Information Disclosure Costs and the Choice of Financing SourceJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1995
- Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm FinanceThe Journal of Business, 1995
- Short-Term versus Long-Term Interests: Capital Structure with Multiple InvestorsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- Public versus Private Borrowing: A Theory with Implications for Bankruptcy ReformJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1994
- Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity RiskThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and Directly Placed DebtJournal of Political Economy, 1991
- The Theory of Capital StructureThe Journal of Finance, 1991