Factors Affecting the Frequency, Timing, and Sign of Informal Supervisory Feedback to Subordinates in a Simulated Work Setting
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Vol. 21 (2) , 187-200
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2102_3
Abstract
Three critical characteristics of informal supervisory feedback to subordinates were defined which determine message effectiveness: frequency, timing and sign. Three potentially important determinants of these characteristics were identified (subordinate performance level, feedback mode, and supervisor-subordinate interdependence) and experimentally manipulated in a multivariate 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design. One-hundred male psychology students functioned as supervisors of four-man groups in a simulated work setting. Overall MANOVA results were highly significant. Follow-up ANOVA findings indicated that: (a) supervisors gave more frequent feedback to poor performers than to good ones, (b) feedback frequency was higher when the mode was written than face-to-face, andKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of feedback sources as a function of role and organizational level.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980
- Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Attributional processes of leaders in leader—Member interactionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979
- Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory?American Psychologist, 1979
- Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975
- Performance satisfaction as a function of the difference between expected and reported performance at five levels of reported performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1972
- Change in confidence following success or failure as a predictor of subsequent performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968
- LET THEM KNOW!Personnel Psychology, 1962
- Effects of Knowledge of Performance: A Survey and Tentative Theoretical FormulationThe Journal of General Psychology, 1956