Sample variance in photometric redshift calibration: cosmological biases and survey requirements
Open Access
- 17 April 2012
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Vol. 423 (1) , 909-924
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20927.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of six photometric redshift methods applied to 1.5 million luminous red galaxiesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2011
- CHARACTERIZING AND PROPAGATING MODELING UNCERTAINTIES IN PHOTOMETRICALLY DERIVED REDSHIFT DISTRIBUTIONSThe Astrophysical Journal, 2011
- A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES AFFECTING THE STELLAR MASS-HALO MASS RELATION FOR 0 <z< 4The Astrophysical Journal, 2010
- Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: weak-lensing survey requirementsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2010
- Photometric redshifts for weak lensing tomography from space: the role of optical and near infrared photometryMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2008
- Optimal surveys for weak-lensing tomographyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2007
- K-Corrections and Filter Transformations in the Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-InfraredThe Astronomical Journal, 2007
- Weak gravitational lensingPhysics Reports, 2001
- Bayesian Photometric Redshift EstimationThe Astrophysical Journal, 2000
- Measuring and modelling the redshift evolution of clustering: the Hubble Deep Field NorthMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1999