Rethinking Medicare Reform
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 17 (1) , 52-68
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.17.1.52
Abstract
Many health policy analysts argue that demographic pressures, the inflationary nature of fee-for-service payment, and the uncontrollable nature of defined-benefit insurance make Medicare unsustainable in its current form. They assert that Medicare can remain fiscally viable in the next century only by embracing a voucher system and exposing beneficiaries to the economic consequences of their medical care decisions. We argue here, however, that Medicare need not rely on vouchers or on placing financial incentives on individual beneficiaries to control costs. Instead, we contend that Medicare can control expenditures the way most other industrial democracies do: through budgetary caps and centralized regulation of provider payments.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in 4-Year Health Outcomes for Elderly and Poor, Chronically III Patients Treated in HMO and Fee-for-Service SystemsJAMA, 1996
- The Medicare Reform Debate: What Is the Next Step?Health Affairs, 1995
- Medicare: What to Do?The Brookings Review, 1995
- Preserving And Strengthening MedicareHealth Affairs, 1995
- Understanding the Choices in Health Care ReformJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1994
- The Demand for Physician Services in a Changing Health Care System: A SynthesisMedical Care Review, 1993
- Illusions of Necessity: Evading Responsibility for Choice in Health CareJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1985